<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week 3 Slides</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uwruby.com/2008/04/week-3-slides/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uwruby.com/2008/04/week-3-slides/</link>
	<description>UW Ruby Class Blog!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: UW Ruby Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Week 3 Homework Update</title>
		<link>http://uwruby.com/2008/04/week-3-slides/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>UW Ruby Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Week 3 Homework Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uwruby.com/?p=12#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] found a problem with the Week 3 homework and posted in the comments for week 3. In the week 3 homework, test_add_to_metaclass should be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] found a problem with the Week 3 homework and posted in the comments for week 3. In the week 3 homework, test_add_to_metaclass should be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Patterson</title>
		<link>http://uwruby.com/2008/04/week-3-slides/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uwruby.com/?p=12#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Absolutely.  I think I had 1.9 on the brain.  As we discussed in class, 1.8 is not very consistent when it comes to Strings vs Symbols.  Changing those to strings is the right thing to do!  Good catch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely.  I think I had 1.9 on the brain.  As we discussed in class, 1.8 is not very consistent when it comes to Strings vs Symbols.  Changing those to strings is the right thing to do!  Good catch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrick West</title>
		<link>http://uwruby.com/2008/04/week-3-slides/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrick West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uwruby.com/?p=12#comment-10</guid>
		<description>There's a slight 1.9isim in the Week 3 homework.  It seems the test case 
for test_add_to_the_metaclass is expecting the array of method names returned from Kernel#singleton_methods to be symbols.  However, in 1.8 they are Strings as it is discussed here: http://eigenclass.org/hiki.rb?Changes+in+Ruby+1.9 in the section "Kernel#singleton_methods, Kernel#methods".  Is it OK for us to go ahead and change the test case to the 1.8 version?

--Garrick West</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a slight 1.9isim in the Week 3 homework.  It seems the test case<br />
for test_add_to_the_metaclass is expecting the array of method names returned from Kernel#singleton_methods to be symbols.  However, in 1.8 they are Strings as it is discussed here: <a href="http://eigenclass.org/hiki.rb?Changes+in+Ruby+1.9" rel="nofollow">http://eigenclass.org/hiki.rb?Changes+in+Ruby+1.9</a> in the section &#8220;Kernel#singleton_methods, Kernel#methods&#8221;.  Is it OK for us to go ahead and change the test case to the 1.8 version?</p>
<p>&#8211;Garrick West</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh Caplan</title>
		<link>http://uwruby.com/2008/04/week-3-slides/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh Caplan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 05:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uwruby.com/?p=12#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure if this was brought up in class, but I found this wonderful explanation of metaclasses by the always poignant Why:

http://whytheluckystiff.net/articles/seeingMetaclassesClearly.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if this was brought up in class, but I found this wonderful explanation of metaclasses by the always poignant Why:</p>
<p><a href="http://whytheluckystiff.net/articles/seeingMetaclassesClearly.html" rel="nofollow">http://whytheluckystiff.net/articles/seeingMetaclassesClearly.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Holton</title>
		<link>http://uwruby.com/2008/04/week-3-slides/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Holton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uwruby.com/?p=12#comment-8</guid>
		<description>"...there's a girl that's been on my miiind..." +
3.times do &#124;i&#124;
  "su "
end
+ssudio

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gB775nB3YBI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;there&#8217;s a girl that&#8217;s been on my miiind&#8230;&#8221; +<br />
3.times do |i|<br />
  &#8220;su &#8221;<br />
end<br />
+ssudio</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gB775nB3YBI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gB775nB3YBI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
